Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Elections 2024 live updates: Biden campaign accepts invite to a vice-presidential debate 

David Trone and the history of candidates lighting their money on fire

Trump allies call trial a ‘sham.’ Public opinion isn’t cooperating.

Flying budget airlines might not be as cheap as it seems

Some cruise prices are about to get a little more clear

Cruise ships to return to Baltimore two months after bridge collapse 

Netflix will air NFL’s Christmas games, a major step for streaming service

Sam Feist, longtime CNN executive, will become CEO of C-SPAN

Michael Cohen testimony ties Donald Trump to hush money payment

The Post’s choices in Northern Virginia’s U.S. House primaries

States see legalized sports betting as a tax windfall — but at what cost?

Haiti’s plight is a case study in the ‘responsibility to protect’

Cruise settles with person dragged under one of its robotaxis

Google’s AI answers could come back to bite it

Senators studied AI for a year. Critics call the result ‘pathetic.’

The 35 best things to do in D.C. this weekend and next week

Rating every game on the Commanders’ 2024 schedule

The 26 best new restaurants in the D.C. area

Riots are flaring on a French archipelago in the South Pacific. Here’s why. 

Shooting leaves Slovakia’s Fico in serious condition, country on edge 

Who is Robert Fico, Slovakia’s prime minister who was shot?

Carolyn Hax: Fiancé plans to have a baby with someone else

Ask Sahaj: I live with my parents and generational trauma ‘runs the house’

Miss Manners: Co-worker lies to avoid doing her job

Puppy abandoned with heart-rending note is adopted, named Minerva

Man, 91, shocks tiny firehouse with $500K gift: ‘Nobody knew how much I’d saved’

Retired cop meets abandoned baby he helped 23 years ago: ‘What are the odds?’

Look to the cloud to protect the life documents saved on your computer

Can you spot bad financial advice on TikTok? Take our quiz.

5 myths about Social Security as the program faces a funding crisis

Best Places to Work in the Federal Government 2023

Suspect in Slovakian prime minister shooting arrested

Frankie the colored bull terrier wins terrier group

President Joe Biden Joint Chiefs and Combatant Commanders 

See more coverage in your recommendations

Get the weekly Campaign Moment newsletter

Set alerts for major election developments

Election 2024

The Campaign Moment newsletter

Politics alerts

Tom Brenner

The Supreme Court on Wednesday seemed likely to reinstate a South Carolina congressional map drawn by the GOP-majority legislature that a lower court found “exiled” 30,000 Black voters to create a district safer for a White Republican incumbent.

Just a few months ago, the justices <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/08/supreme-court-alabama-redistricting-voting-rights/" target="_blank">found that Alabama had illegally drawn its congressional map </a>to dilute the power of Black voters.

But on Wednesday, the question was whether South Carolina’s new map — which moved Black voters from one congressional district to another — was a permissible gerrymander to bolster the Republican majority or an unconstitutional attempt to sort voters by race.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who wrote the Alabama decision last term, said disentangling race and politics in gerrymandering cases is “very, very difficult” when voting is polarized along both racial and political lines. Black voters and organizations challenging the South Carolina maps, he said, had no direct evidence that racial data, rather than political data, dominated.

“Have we ever had a case before where all it is is circumstantial evidence?” Roberts asked Leah C. Aden of the Legal Defense Fund, which is representing the challengers. He added, “I’m not saying you can’t get there, but it does seem that this would be breaking new ground in our voting rights jurisprudence.”

The case is one of<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/09/27/supreme-court-alabama-redistricting/" target=_blank> several across the country</a> in which courts are considering challenges to congressional redistricting plans, enough that their eventual rulings could play a large role in determining which party controls the U.S. House after the 2024 elections.

Courts to play pivotal role in battle for control of Congress

In the Alabama case, Roberts and Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh joined the court’s three liberals to form a majority, finding the state’s plan violated the Voting Rights Act by not creating a second congressional district — out of seven in the state — where Black voters made up a large-enough share of the electorate to have a strong chance of electing their candidate of choice.

Tuesday’s South Carolina case was in some sense the flip side of that decision, examining whether the maps violated the Constitution’s bar on using race as an unjustified and predominant factor in drawing districts.

A three-judge panel in January said the map illegally split Black neighborhoods in the Charleston area. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), who had squeaked by her Democratic opponent in 2020, coasted to victory in 2022 in the redrawn district, keeping her seat in what has become the state’s 6-to-1 Republican-dominated congressional delegation.

“The strategies . . . ultimately exiled over 30,000 African American citizens from their previous district and created a stark racial gerrymander of Charleston County and the City of Charleston,” said the panel of judges, two nominated by President Barack Obama and one by <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/candidates/joe-biden-2024/" target="_blank" class="contextual_link">President Biden</a>.

The judges, quoting from testimony at trial, found that the changes “were ‘dramatic’ and ‘created tremendous disparity’ in the placement of African Americans” in two congressional districts — Mace’s and the district represented by Rep. James E. Clyburn, the assistant Democratic House leader.

The<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-807/255411/20230223140757233_Corrected%20Alexander%20v.%20S.C.%20State%20Conference%20of%20the%20NAACP%20-%20Jurisdictional%20Statement%20-%20Appendix.pdf" target=_blank> judges found that South Carolina’s mapmaker </a>tried to keep the African American population below a certain target in Mace’s district, treating Charleston County “in a fundamentally different way than the rest of the state.”

Washington lawyer John M. Gore, representing South Carolina, said the lower-court panel had made numerous missteps and one fundamental one.

The legislature achieved its political goals “by moving Republicans into the district and Democrats out of the district,” Gore said. “All of the direct evidence confirms that it used political data, not racial data, to identify Republicans and Democrats.”

The liberal justices said that just was not so. The lower court held a trial, weighed evidence and judged the credibility of each side’s experts, Justice Elena Kagan said. “And the court said no, the evidence showed that you were doing race as a proxy for politics.”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor agreed, asking detailed questions about whether White Democrats were treated differently from Black Democrats. “The numbers are incredible,” she said

Much of the hearing was focused on those types of specifics.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said the Supreme Court’s role should be only to decide whether the lower court had made a clear legal error in its ruling. But conservative justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said that was different from simply deferring to the lower court.

Finding clear error “is a very demanding standard, but it is not an impossible standard,” Alito said. “And it doesn’t mean that we simply rubber-stamp findings by a district court, particularly in a case like this, where we are the only court that is going to be reviewing those findings.”

Alito and Kavanaugh asked questions about the methodology of the experts and details about moving voters in certain neighborhoods from Mace’s district to Clyburn’s, and vice versa.

Justice Neil M. Gorsuch questioned Justice Department lawyer Caroline A. Flynn, who supported the Black challengers, about a passage in the government’s brief that said “it would have been plausible for the district court to have come to the exact opposite conclusion it came to here,” meaning that race did not predominate.

Kavanaugh followed up. “You’ve looked at this record and you obviously concluded that the district court could have said no, that expert evidence is not sufficiently reliable or probative in light of the overall record to support the plaintiff’s case?” he asked.

“Well, we think that the expert evidence is a big part of it,” Flynn responded. “We think that there were credibility findings here that might have come out differently with a different three-judge panel, possibly. It’s kind of hard to tell because we weren’t there seeing the witnesses firsthand.”

The state has asked the justices to decide Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP by the end of the year because of the approaching 2024 primaries.

University of Florida

Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He joined The Post to cover Maryland politics, and he has served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor and national political editor. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006.

Robert Barnes

South Carolina congressional map argued before Supreme Court justices

the-washington-post

For the Washington Post 

Biden administration

The Fix

The 202s

Polling

Democracy in America

Balance of Power Pair

U.S. House Aggregate

U.S. Senate Aggregate

Politics

washpost

prism://prism.query/site,/politics/courts-law&limit=20

Courts & Law

Latest news and coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court

prism://prism.query/site-articles-only,/politics&limit=20

Cut through the 2024 election noise. Get The Campaign Moment newsletter.

Post Politics from The Washington Post is the source for political news headlines, in-depth politics coverage and political opinion, plus breaking news on the biden administration and White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, elections and more.

prism://prism.query/site,/politics/the-fix&limit=6

prism://prism.query/site,/national-security/justice&limit=20

Justice

prism://prism.query/site,/national-security&limit=20

Sign up for Fact Checker, our weekly review of what's true, false or in-between in politics.

National Security

The Washington Post's coverage of national security issues, including the military, intelligence, justice, and foreign policy.

prism://prism.query/site-articles-only,/national&limit=20

National

The Washington Post's national news coverage. Get the latest national news, featuring national security, science and the courts. Read breaking national news headlines from across the U.S.