skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Soil-Powered Computing: The Engineer's Guide to Practical Soil Microbial Fuel Cell Design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 January 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Human-caused climate degradation and the explosion of electronic waste have pushed the computing community to explore fundamental alternatives to the current battery-powered, over-provisioned ubiquitous computing devices that need constant replacement and recharging. Soil Microbial Fuel Cells (SMFCs) offer promise as a renewable energy source that is biocompatible and viable in difficult environments where traditional batteries and solar panels fall short. However, SMFC development is in its infancy, and challenges like robustness to environmental factors and low power output stymie efforts to implement real-world applications in terrestrial environments. This work details a 2-year iterative process that uncovers barriers to practical SMFC design for powering electronics, which we address through a mechanistic understanding of SMFC theory from the literature. We present nine months of deployment data gathered from four SMFC experiments exploring cell geometries, resulting in an improved SMFC that generates power across a wider soil moisture range. From these experiments, we extracted key lessons and a testing framework, assessed SMFC's field performance, contextualized improvements with emerging and existing computing systems, and demonstrated the improved SMFC powering a wireless sensor for soil moisture and touch sensing. We contribute our data, methodology, and designs to establish the foundation for a sustainable, soil-powered future.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. 2018. Silica Statistics and Information. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/national-minerals-information-center/silica-statistics-and-information#:~:text=In%20almost%20all%20cases%2C%20silica,usually%20has%20limited%20environmental%20impact.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2020. Reference Electrodes. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Analytical_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_(Analytical_Chemistry)/Analytical_Sciences_Digital_Library/Courseware/Analytical_Electrochemistry%3A_Potentiometry/03_Potentiometric_Theory/04_Reference_Electrodes#:~:text=Silver%2FSilver%20Chloride%20(Ag%2FAgCl),-The%20silver%2Fsilver&text=with%20a%20value%20for%20E,which%20is%20not%20exactly%20unity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2022. Cleaning Up Electronic Waste (E-Waste). https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/cleaning-electronic-waste-e-wasteGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2022. End-of-Life Solar Panels: Regulations and Management. https://www.epa.gov/hw/end-life-solar-panels-regulations-and-management#Are%20Solar%20Panels%20Hazardous%20Waste?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2023. Artasie Real-Time Clock-AM1805. https://ambiq.com/artasie-am1805/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2023. MudWatt: Grow a Living Fuel Cell. https://www.magicalmicrobes.com/products/mudwatt-clean-energy-from-mudGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yaser Abdollahfard, Mehdi Sedighi, and Mostafa Ghasemi. 2023. A New Approach for Improving Microbial Fuel Cell Performance Using Artificial Intelligence. Sustainability 15, 2 (2023), 1312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. SC Abrahams and K Nassau. 1991. Piezoelectric Materials. Concise Encyclopedia of Advanced Ceramic Materials (1991), 351--354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mikhail Afanasov, Naveed Bhatti, Dennis Campagna, Giacomo Caslini, Fabio Massimo Centonze, Koustabh Dolui, Andrea Maioli, Erica Barone, Muhammad Hamad Alizai, Junaid Haroon Siddiqui, and Luca Mottola. 2020. Battery-less Zero-maintenance Embedded Sensing at the Mithraeum of Circus Maximus. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Wilgince Apollon, Sathish-Kumar Kamaraj, Héctor Silos-Espino, Catarino Perales-Segovia, Luis L Valera-Montero, Víctor A Maldonado-Ruelas, Marco A Vázquez-Gutiérrez, Raúl A Ortiz-Medina, Silvia Flores-Benítez, and Juan F Gómez-Leyva. 2020. Impact of Opuntia species plant bio-battery in a semi-arid environment: Demonstration of their applications. Applied Energy 279 (2020), 115788.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Nivedita Arora, Ali Mirzazadeh, Injoo Moon, Charles Ramey, Yuhui Zhao, Daniela C Rodriguez, Gregory D Abowd, and Thad Starner. 2021. MARS: Nano-Power Battery-free Wireless Interfaces for Touch, Swipe and Speech Input. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1305--1325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniel Ayala-Ruiz, Alejandro Castillo Atoche, Erica Ruiz-Ibarra, Edith Osorio de la Rosa, and Javier Vázquez Castillo. 2019. A self-powered PMFC-based wireless sensor node for smart city applications. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2019 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Abu Bakar, Rishabh Goel, Jasper de Winkel, Jason Huang, Saad Ahmed, Bashima Islam, Przemysław Pawełczak, Kasım Sinan Yıldırım, and Josiah Hester. 2022. Protean: An Energy-Efficient and Heterogeneous Platform for Adaptive and Hardware-Accelerated Battery-Free Computing. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '22). 207--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Abu Bakar, Alexander G Ross, Kasim Sinan Yildirim, and Josiah Hester. 2021. Rehash: A flexible, developer focused, heuristic adaptation platform for intermittently powered computing. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 5, 3 (2021), 1--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Paul Basore and David Feldman. 2022. Solar Photovoltaics-Supply Chain Deep Dive Assessment. Technical Report. USDOE Office of Policy (PO).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. David Benedetti, Chiara Petrioli, and Dora Spenza. 2013. GreenCastalia: An energy-harvesting-enabled framework for the Castalia simulator. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Energy Neutral Sensing Systems. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Bradford Campbell, Joshua Adkins, and Prabal Dutta. 2016. Cinamin: A Perpetual and Nearly Invisible BLE Beacon. In International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks (EWSN).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bradford Campbell and Prabal Dutta. 2014. An energy-harvesting sensor architecture and toolkit for building monitoring and event detection. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings (BuildSys'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 100--109. https://doi.org/10.1145/2674061.2674083Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Armande Capitaine, Gael Pillonnet, Thibaut Chailloux, Adrien Morel, and Bruno Allard. 2017. Impact of switching of the electrical harvesting interface on microbial fuel cell losses. In IEEE SENSORS. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2017.8234189Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Martin H Chantigny. 2003. Dissolved and water-extractable organic matter in soils: a review on the influence of land use and management practices. Geoderma 113, 3-4 (2003), 357--380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. B Chen, W Cai, and A Garg. 2023. Relationship between bioelectricity and soil--water characteristics of biochar-aided plant microbial fuel cell. Acta Geotechnica (2023), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Chaoji Chen, Ying Zhang, Yiju Li, Jiaqi Dai, Jianwei Song, Yonggang Yao, Yunhui Gong, Iain Kierzewski, Jia Xie, and Liangbing Hu. 2017. All-wood, low tortuosity, aqueous, biodegradable supercapacitors with ultra-high capacitance. Energy & Environmental Science 10, 2 (2017), 538--545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Alexei Colin, Emily Ruppel, and Brandon Lucia. 2018. A reconfigurable energy storage architecture for energy-harvesting devices. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. 767--781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Pierangela Cristiani, Iwona Gajda, John Greenman, Francesca Pizza, Paolo Bonelli, and Ioannis Ieropoulos. 2019. Long term feasibility study of in-field floating microbial fuel cells for monitoring anoxic wastewater and energy harvesting. Frontiers in Energy Research 7 (2019), 119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Katarzyna Dabrowska-Zielinska, Jan Musial, Alicja Malinska, Maria Budzynska, Radoslaw Gurdak, Wojciech Kiryla, Maciej Bartold, and Patryk Grzybowski. 2018. Soil moisture in the Biebrza Wetlands retrieved from Sentinel-1 imagery. Remote Sensing 10, 12 (2018), 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sumon Datta, Saleh Taghvaeian, and Jacob Stivers. 2018. Understanding soil water content and thresholds for irrigation management -Oklahoma State University. https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/understanding-soil-water-content-and-thresholds-for-irrigation-management.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Frank A de Carvalho, Juliana NP Nobre, Rosana P Cambraia, Alexandre C Silva, José D Fabris, Arlete B dos Reis, and Bernat V Prat. 2021. Quartz mining waste for concrete production: environment and public health. Sustainability 14, 1 (2021), 389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jasper De Winkel, Vito Kortbeek, Josiah Hester, and Przemyslaw Pawelczak. 2020. Battery-free game boy. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 3 (2020), 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Eimear Deady, Charlie Moon, Kathryn Moore, Kathryn M Goodenough, and Robin K Shail. 2022. Bismuth: Economic geology and value chains. Ore Geology Reviews 143 (2022), 104722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Samuel DeBruin, Bradford Campbell, and Prabal Dutta. 2013. Monjolo: An Energy-harvesting Energy Meter Architecture. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2517351.2517363Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Conrad Donovan, Alim Dewan, Deukhyoun Heo, and Haluk Beyenal. 2008. Batteryless, wireless sensor powered by a sediment microbial fuel cell. Environmental science & technology 42, 22 (2008), 8591--8596.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sara J Dunaj, Joseph J Vallino, Mark E Hines, Marcus Gay, Christine Kobyljanec, and Juliette N Rooney-Varga. 2012. Relationships between soil organic matter, nutrients, bacterial community structure, and the performance of microbial fuel cells. Environmental Science & Technology 46, 3 (2012), 1914--1922.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jakub Dziegielowski, Benjamin Metcalfe, Paola Villegas-Guzman, Carlos A Martínez-Huitle, Adryane Gorayeb, Jannis Wenk, and Mirella Di Lorenzo. 2020. Development of a functional stack of soil microbial fuel cells to power a water treatment reactor: From the lab to field trials in North East Brazil. Applied Energy 278 (2020), 115680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Shahjadi Hisan Farjana, Nazmul Huda, and MA Parvez Mahmud. 2019. Life cycle assessment of cobalt extraction process. Journal of Sustainable Mining 18, 3 (2019), 150--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Matthew Furlong, Josiah Hester, Kevin Storer, and Jacob Sorber. 2016. Realistic simulation for tiny batteryless sensors. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Energy Harvesting and Energy-Neutral Sensing Systems. 23--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Kai Geissdoerfer and Marco Zimmerling. 2022. Learning to communicate effectively between battery-free devices. In 19th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 22). 419--435.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Cihan Berk Güngör, Patrick P. Mercier, and Hakan Töreyin. 2021. A 3.75 nW Analog Electrocardiogram Processor Facilitating Stochastic Resonance for Real-Time R-wave Detection. In 2021 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS). 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/BioCAS49922.2021.9645028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Theo Henckens. 2021. Chapter 7 - Thirteen scarce resources analyzed. In Governance of the World's Mineral Resources, Theo Henckens (Ed.). Elsevier, 147--380. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823886-8.00007-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Carolyn Hoskinson. 2023. Lithium Battery Recycling Regulatory Status and Frequently Asked Questions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yongsheng Huang, Daochun Xu, Jiangming Kan, and Wenbin Li. 2019. Study on field experiments of forest soil thermoelectric power generation devices. Plos One 14, 8 (2019), e0221019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Sophie Theresia Huber and Karl W Steininger. 2022. Critical sustainability issues in the production of wind and solar electricity generation as well as storage facilities and possible solutions. Journal of Cleaner Production 339 (2022), 130720.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Rakesh Krishnamoorthy Iyer and Srikanth Pilla. 2021. Environmental profile of thermoelectrics for applications with continuous waste heat generation via life cycle assessment. Science of The Total Environment 752 (2021), 141674.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Dhananjay Jagtap and Pat Pannuto. 2020. Reliable Energy Sources as a Foundation for Reliable Intermittent Systems. In Proceedings of the Eigth ACM International Workshop on Energy Harvesting and Energy-Neutral Sensing Systems (ENSsys '20). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3417308.3430276Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Dhananjay Jagtap and Pat Pannuto. 2021. Repurposing Cathodic Protection Systems as Reliable, in-situ, Ambient Batteries for Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'21). ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Yun-Bin Jiang, Wen-Hui Zhong, Cheng Han, and Huan Deng. 2016. Characterization of electricity generated by soil in microbial fuel cells and the isolation of soil source exoelectrogenic bacteria. Frontiers in microbiology 7 (2016), 1776.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Shan Jin, Deying Mu, Ziang Lu, Ruhong Li, Zhu Liu, Yue Wang, Shuang Tian, and Changsong Dai. 2022. A comprehensive review on the recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries: Urgent status and technology advances. Journal of Cleaner Production 340 (2022), 130535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130535Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Colleen Josephson, Neal Jackson, and Pat Pannuto. 2020. Farming Electrons: Galvanic Versus Microbial Energy in Soil Batteries. IEEE Sensors Letters 4, 12 (2020), 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2020.3043666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Colleen Josephson, Manikanta Kotaru, Keith Winstein, Sachin Katti, and Ranveer Chandra. 2021. Low-cost in-ground soil moisture sensing with radar backscatter tags. In ACM SIGCAS conference on computing and sustainable societies. 299--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Colleen Josephson, Weitao Shuai, Gabriel Marcano, Pat Pannuto, Josiah Hester, and George Wells. 2022. The Future of Clean Computing May Be Dirty. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications 26, 3 (2022), 9--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Zerina Kapetanovic, Miguel Morales, and Joshua R Smith. 2022. Communication by means of modulated Johnson noise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, 49 (2022), e2201337119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Atsushi Kouzuma, Nobuo Kaku, and Kazuya Watanabe. 2014. Microbial electricity generation in rice paddy fields: recent advances and perspectives in rhizosphere microbial fuel cells. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 98, 23 (2014), 9521--9526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Thi Xuan Huong Le, Mikhael Bechelany, and Marc Cretin. 2017. Carbon felt based-electrodes for energy and environmental applications: A review. Carbon 122 (2017), 564--591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. O Lefebvre, A Uzabiaga, YJ Shen, Z Tan, YP Cheng, W Liu, and HY Ng. 2011. Conception and optimization of a membrane electrode assembly microbial fuel cell (MEA-MFC) for treatment of domestic wastewater. Water Science and Technology 64, 7 (2011), 1527--1532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Fu-To Lin, Yu-Chun Kuo, Jen-Chien Hsieh, Hsi-Yuan Tsai, Yu-Te Liao, and Huang-Chen Lee. 2015. A self-powering wireless environment monitoring system using soil energy. IEEE Sensors Journal 15, 7 (2015), 3751--3758.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Brandon Lucia, Brad Denby, Zachary Manchester, Harsh Desai, Emily Ruppel, and Alexei Colin. 2021. Computational Nanosatellite Constellations: Opportunities and Challenges. GetMobile: Mobile Comp. and Comm. 25, 1 (jun 2021), 16--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3471440.3471446Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. David Luria, Alexander Fantalkin, Ezra Zilberman, and Eyal Ben-Dor. 2020. Identifying the Brazil nut effect in archaeological site formation processes. Mediterranean Geoscience Reviews 2 (2020), 267--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Andrea Maioli and Luca Mottola. 2021. ALFRED: Virtual Memory for Intermittent Computing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 261--273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Gabriel Marcano, Colleen Josephson, and Pat Pannuto. 2022. Early Characterization of Soil Microbial Fuel Cells. In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) Special Session on Smart Agriculture (ISCAS '22). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Gabriel Marcano and Pat Pannuto. 2021. Powering an E-Ink Display from Soil Bacteria. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 590--591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Gabriel Marcano and Pat Pannuto. 2022. Soil Power? Can Microbial Fuel Cells Power Non-Trivial Sensors?. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on No Power and Low Power Internet-of-Things. 8--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Catarina Lousa Marques. 2021. Theoretical Analysis of a Potentiostat for Studying Microbial Fuel Cells. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidade da Beira Interior (Portugal).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Christine Minke, Ulrich Kunz, and Thomas Turek. 2017. Carbon felt and carbon fiber-A techno-economic assessment of felt electrodes for redox flow battery applications. Journal of Power Sources 342 (2017), 116--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Abdelrhman Mohamed, Eduardo Sanchez, Natalie Sanchez, Maren L Friesen, and Haluk Beyenal. 2021. Electrochemically Active Biofilms as an Indicator of Soil Health. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 168, 8 (2021), 087511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Saman Naderiparizi, Mehrdad Hessar, Vamsi Talla, Shyamnath Gollakota, and Joshua R Smith. 2018. Towards battery-free HD video streaming. In 15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 18). 233--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Nedal T Nassar, Haeyeon Kim, Max Frenzel, Michael S Moats, and Sarah M Hayes. 2022. Global tellurium supply potential from electrolytic copper refining. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 184 (2022), 106434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Dang-Trang Nguyen, Kozo Taguchi, et al. 2021. A portable soil microbial fuel cell for sensing soil water content. Measurement: Sensors 18 (2021), 100231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Hoang-Uyen-Dung Nguyen, Dang-Trang Nguyen, and Kozo Taguchi. 2021. A novel design portable plugged-type soil microbial fuel cell for bioelectricity generation. Energies 14, 3 (2021), 553.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Naoki Nitta, Feixiang Wu, Jung Tae Lee, and Gleb Yushin. 2015. Li-ion battery materials: present and future. Materials today 18, 5 (2015), 252--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [n.d.]. Bismuth Telluride. CAMEO Chemicals ([n. d.]). https://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/25002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Edith Osorio-de-la Rosa, Javier Vazquez-Castillo, Alejandro Castillo-Atoche, Julio Heredia-Lozano, Andrea Castillo-Atoche, Guillermo Becerra-Nunez, and Romeli Barbosa. 2020. Arrays of plant microbial fuel cells for implementing self-sustainable wireless sensor networks. IEEE sensors journal 21, 2 (2020), 1965--1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Fatemeh Oveisi, Narges Fallah, and Bahram Nasernejad. 2021. Biodegradation of synthetic wastewater containing styrene in microbial fuel cell: Effect of adaptation of microbial community. Fuel 305 (2021), 121382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Pat Pannuto, Benjamin Kempke, and Prabal Dutta. 2018. Slocalization: Sub-uW ultra wideband backscatter localization. In 2018 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). IEEE, 242--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Joseph A Paradiso and Thad Starner. 2005. Energy scavenging for mobile and wireless electronics. IEEE Pervasive computing 4, 1 (2005), 18--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Douglas Pedersen, Michael Lybbert, and Roseanne Warren. 2022. Life Cycle Analysis of LiCoO2/Graphite Batteries with Cooling Using Combined Electrochemical-Thermal Modeling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 180 (2022), 106204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Andrea Pietrelli, Andrea Micangeli, Vincenzo Ferrara, and Alessandro Raffi. 2014. Wireless sensor network powered by a terrestrial microbial fuel cell as a sustainable land monitoring energy system. Sustainability 6, 10 (2014), 7263--7275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Sudeep C Popat and César I Torres. 2016. Critical transport rates that limit the performance of microbial electrochemistry technologies. Bioresource technology 215 (2016), 265--273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Michael C Potter. 1911. Electrical effects accompanying the decomposition of organic compounds. Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series b, containing papers of a biological character 84, 571 (1911), 260--276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Song Qiu, Zhenyu Guo, Faiza Naz, Zhao Yang, and Changyuan Yu. 2021. An overview in the development of cathode materials for the improvement in power generation of microbial fuel cells. Bioelectrochemistry 141 (2021), 107834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Benjamin Ransford, Jacob Sorber, and Kevin Fu. 2011. Mementos: System support for long-running computation on RFID-scale devices. In Proceedings of the sixteenth international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems. 159--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Bruce E Rittmann and Perry L McCarty. 2001. Environmental biotechnology: principles and applications. McGraw-Hill Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. René A Rozendal, Hubertus VM Hamelers, Korneel Rabaey, Jurg Keller, and Cees JN Buisman. 2008. Towards practical implementation of bioelectrochemical wastewater treatment. Trends in biotechnology 26, 8 (2008), 450--459.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Joaquim Sanz, Oriol Tomasa, Abigail Jimenez-Franco, and Nor Sidki-Rius. 2022. Zirconium (Zr)[Z= 40]. In Elements and Mineral Resources. Springer, 255--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Davide Sartori and Davide Brunelli. 2016. A smart sensor for precision agriculture powered by microbial fuel cells. In 2016 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Victor Shnayder, Mark Hempstead, Bor-rong Chen, Geoff Werner Allen, and Matt Welsh. 2004. Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. 188--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Lukas Sigrist, Andres Gomez, Roman Lim, Stefan Lippuner, Matthias Leubin, and Lothar Thiele. 2016. Rocketlogger: Mobile power logger for prototyping iot devices: Demo abstract. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems CD-ROM. 288--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Meshack Imologie Simeon, Abdulganiy Olayinka Raji, Gbabo Agidi, and CA Okoro-Shekwaga. 2016. Performance of a Single Chamber Soil Microbial Fuel Cell at Varied External Resistances for Electrical Power Generation. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Meshack Imologie Simeon, Alfons Weig, and Ruth Freitag. 2022. Optimization of soil microbial fuel cell for sustainable bio-electricity production: combined effects of electrode material, electrode spacing, and substrate feeding frequency on power generation and microbial community diversity. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts 15, 1 (2022), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Shikha Singh, Melanie A Mayes, Stephanie N Kivlin, and Sindhu Jagadamma. 2023. How the Birch effect differs in mechanisms and magnitudes due to soil texture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 179 (2023), 108973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Meera Stephen, Ali Nawaz, Sang Yeon Lee, Prashant Sonar, and Wei Lin Leong. 2023. Biodegradable materials for transient organic transistors. Advanced Functional Materials 33, 6 (2023), 2208521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Emilius Sudirjo, Pim De Jager, Cees JN Buisman, and David PBTB Strik. 2019. Performance and long distance data acquisition via LoRa technology of a tubular plant microbial fuel cell located in a paddy field in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Sensors 19, 21 (2019), 4647.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Natalia F Tapia, Claudia Rojas, Carlos A Bonilla, and Ignacio T Vargas. 2017. Evaluation of Sedum as driver for plant microbial fuel cells in a semi-arid green roof ecosystem. Ecological Engineering 108 (2017), 203--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Matteo Tucci, Carolina Cruz Viggi, Abraham Esteve Nunez, Andrea Schievano, Korneel Rabaey, and Federico Aulenta. 2021. Empowering electroactive microorganisms for soil remediation: Challenges in the bioelectrochemical removal of petroleum hydrocarbons. Chemical Engineering Journal 419 (2021), 130008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Brendan L Turner, Jack Twiddy, Michael D Wilkins, Srivatsan Ramesh, Katie M Kilgour, Eleo Domingos, Olivia Nasrallah, Stefano Menegatti, and Michael A Daniele. 2023. Biodegradable elastomeric circuit boards from citric acid-based polyesters. npj Flexible Electronics 7, 1 (2023), 25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. María L Vera, Walter R Torres, Claudia I Galli, Alexandre Chagnes, and Victoria Flexer. 2023. Environmental impact of direct lithium extraction from brines. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 4, 3 (2023), 149--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Jun Wang, Huan Deng, Shao-Song Wu, Yong-Cui Deng, Li Liu, Cheng Han, Yun-Bin Jiang, and Wen-Hui Zhong. 2019. Assessment of abundance and diversity of exoelectrogenic bacteria in soil under different land use types. Catena 172 (2019), 572--580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Yuyang Wang, Ye Chen, Qing Wen, Hongtao Zheng, Haitao Xu, and Lijuan Qi. 2019. Electricity generation, energy storage, and microbial-community analysis in microbial fuel cells with multilayer capacitive anodes. Energy 189 (2019), 116342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Samuel C.B. Wong, Sivert T. Sliper, William Wang, Alex S. Weddell, Stephanie Gauthier, and Geoff V. Merrett. 2020. Energy-Aware HW/SW Co-Modeling of Batteryless Wireless Sensor Nodes. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Energy Harvesting and Energy-Neutral Sensing Systems (ENSsys '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 57--63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3417308.3430272Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Jiawei Yang, Shaoan Cheng, Peng Li, Haobin Huang, and Kefa Cen. 2019. Sensitivity to oxygen in microbial electrochemical systems biofilms. Iscience 13 (2019), 163--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  99. Zong-Chuang Yang, Yuan-Yuan Cheng, Feng Zhang, Bing-Bing Li, Yang Mu, Wen-Wei Li, and Han-Qing Yu. 2016. Rapid detection and enumeration of exoelectrogenic bacteria in lake sediments and a wastewater treatment plant using a coupled WO3 nanoclusters and most probable number method. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 3, 4 (2016), 133--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Bao Yu, Liu Feng, Yali He, Lei Yang, and Yu Xun. 2021. Effects of anode materials on the performance and anode microbial community of soil microbial fuel cell. Journal of Hazardous Materials 401 (2021), 123394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Daxing Zhang, Yubing Ge, and Weidong Wang. 2013. Study of a terrestrial microbial fuel cell and the effects of its power generation performance by environmental factors. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems. IEEE, 445--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Feiying Zhang and Hepeng Li. 2022. Effects of landscape restoration on migration of lead and cadmium at an abandoned mine site. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10 (2022), 1057961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. Fang Zhang, Jia Liu, Ivan Ivanov, Marta C Hatzell, Wulin Yang, Yongtae Ahn, and Bruce E Logan. 2014. Reference and counter electrode positions affect electrochemical characterization of bioanodes in different bioelectrochemical systems. Biotechnology and bioengineering 111, 10 (2014), 1931--1939.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Huajie Zou, Fuhai Cai, Jianghua Zhang, and Zhenyu Chu. 2022. Overview of environmental airflow energy harvesting technology based on piezoelectric effect. Journal of Vibroengineering 24, 1 (2022), 91--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Soil-Powered Computing: The Engineer's Guide to Practical Soil Microbial Fuel Cell Design

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
          Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 7, Issue 4
          December 2023
          1613 pages
          EISSN:2474-9567
          DOI:10.1145/3640795
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author

          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 January 2024
          Published in imwut Volume 7, Issue 4

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)3,723
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)362

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader